top of page

The Myth of Cryptocurrencies Being Harmful to the Environment

Updated: 1 hour ago

Key Points:

  • Blockchain networks consume less energy than most traditional financial systems, with the majority of the energy they use coming from renewable sources.

  • Innovations in consensus mechanisms, such as transitioning to more efficient "proof of stake" systems, significantly reduce energy consumption in cryptocurrencies.

  • Cryptocurrencies and blockchain can offer direct solutions to sustainability problems in various industries, thereby contributing to a more sustainable future on a global scale.

In this article, we explore the misconception that cryptocurrencies are inherently harmful to the environment. Join us in examining blockchain solutions to overcome energy inefficiencies and ways in which they can contribute to addressing global sustainability issues.

The impact of cryptocurrencies on the environment has become a hot topic in recent years, with many believing that the core technology behind cryptocurrencies is inherently harmful to the environment, especially the cryptocurrency mining process. To dispel this misconception, it is important to understand the underlying reasons for this belief, compare blockchain networks with other systems in terms of energy consumption, and explore the steps the crypto industry is taking to reduce its ecological footprint.

Myth: Cryptocurrencies are inherently harmful to the environment.

Origin of the Misconception

One of the main reasons people associate cryptocurrencies with environmental harm is the energy-intensive nature of the mining process. The original cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, as well as many other established and widely used projects, rely on the "proof of work" (PoW) consensus mechanism to maintain a distributed ledger of transactions. This validation method involves miners using powerful computers to solve complex mathematical puzzles. It is believed that this process consumes a significant amount of electricity, raising concerns about its impact on the environment.

However, critics often focus on the energy consumption of cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin, without providing full context or comparison. Such selective representation can create the impression that cryptocurrencies are inherently harmful to the environment.

A balanced perspective is key to understanding the scale of cryptocurrencies' impact on the environment and its context. The full picture can only be seen when considering various consensus mechanisms and sustainability initiatives aimed at reducing the industry's ecological footprint.

Understanding Energy Consumption Debates in Cryptocurrencies: A Deep Dive

It is important to acknowledge that blockchain networks utilizing the "proof of work" (PoW) mechanism, such as the Bitcoin network, indeed consume a significant amount of energy. However, this alone does not make cryptocurrencies inherently harmful to the environment.

Any direct comparison of energy consumption between blockchains and other industries or activities inevitably encounters the problem of comparing "apples to oranges." Given the uniqueness of a system like Bitcoin, which serves various functions and is truly global, there is no qualitatively and quantitatively similar sector or system for a truly justified direct comparison. Any analogy will, by definition, be partial.

A report by research firm Galaxy Digital for 2021 showed that the energy footprint of the top 100 global banks' data centers is more than twice that of the Bitcoin network, and the energy consumption of "always-on" electrical devices in American households exceeds Bitcoin consumption by 12.1 times. Furthermore, estimates from the World Bank and the International Energy Agency of energy losses during transmission and distribution over a year exceed by 19.4 times what the Bitcoin blockchain uses over the same period.

It can be observed that criticism surrounding energy consumption and environmental harm is rarely directed against traditional financial sectors because they are better understood, and their existence is rarely questioned. Fundamentally, the myth we are debunking today is based on the assumption that, regardless of how much energy Bitcoin and other blockchains consume, the resources they use are ultimately wasted because, supposedly, distributed ledgers and digital assets have no real value.

This assumption is highly inaccurate. Anyone, anywhere in the world, can use Bitcoin for transactions and value storage. Bitcoin transactions can be completed 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. This technology is extremely valuable. Yes, there is an energy cost to maintaining the network. But there is no global financial system that does not consume energy.

This point is best described in the World Economic Forum's Crypto Impact and Sustainability Accelerator (CISA) report: "Cryptocurrencies provide economic freedom to people in developing countries and consume less energy globally than clothes dryers or household refrigerators."

Enhancing the Use of Sustainable Energy

The idea that all Bitcoin mining operations are immediately harmful to the environment is itself a misconception. The Bitcoin Mining Council's report for the second quarter of 2022 showed that 59.5% of the world's energy used for BTC mining comes from renewable sources, indicating a trend toward sustainability in the process. With a broader transition to renewable energy sources worldwide, this trend is likely to accelerate in the future. Additionally, the organization reported a 46% annual increase in mining efficiency due to advancements in semiconductor technology and the implementation of modern mining methods.

These dynamics lead to a reduction in network emissions. There is evidence that, even with the increasing hash rate and overall electricity consumption of the BTC network, emissions are decreasing as miners increasingly opt for more sustainable energy sources.

According to information from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, renewable energy sources accounted for about 13% of total energy consumption in the United States in 2022 and approximately 21.5% of total electricity generation at major power plants. These figures show that bitcoin mining companies rely significantly more on renewable energy than the average American enterprise.

There are also several examples of cryptocurrency mining companies partnering with energy producers to address a phenomenon known as "energy curtailment." This deliberate reduction in energy production to balance supply and demand leads to the underutilization of excess energy. Research shows that cryptocurrency mining can help prevent the curtailment of renewable energy and thereby improve energy utilization efficiency, contributing to the transition to renewable energy.

Meanwhile, one 2022 study estimated that payments via the Bitcoin Lightning protocol are 56 times more energy-efficient than the traditional banking system, further demonstrating the potential for innovation in the cryptocurrency sector.

Consensus Mechanisms and Energy Efficiency

Another important point to consider in the context of the "environmental" myth is that it almost always focuses on Bitcoin and other systems based on Proof of Work (PoW), emphasizing that their design prescribes energy consumption for solving computational tasks. But the reality is that PoW is not the only option.

Blockchains rely on various consensus mechanisms to verify transactions in the network. PoW indeed requires a multitude of machines to solve complex mathematical problems. However, in recent years, an alternative has been gaining popularity in the form of Proof of Stake (PoS), which instead relies on a limited number of nodes selected based on their stake in the network to verify transactions. PoS mechanisms are more energy-efficient, significantly reducing the overall energy consumption of the cryptocurrency - which, as we have seen, is less and more environmentally friendly than critics doubt.

Ethereum, the second-largest blockchain network in the world, transitioned from PoW to PoS in September 2022, with one of the main motivators being the superiority in energy efficiency of the latter consensus mechanism. The Crypto Carbon Ratings Institute (CCRI) studied the impact of Ethereum's transition and found that its annual electricity consumption decreased by over 99.9%. Consequently, Ethereum's carbon footprint also decreased by 99.9%.

This equates to reducing emissions from the height of the Eiffel Tower to the size of a tennis ball, or a swimming pool to a small soda bottle. Research from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance shows that Ethereum's annual electricity consumption is now equivalent to the annual energy consumption of 587 air conditioners or less than many major companies and famous buildings worldwide. For a system that has processed over 400 million transactions with an average transaction execution time of just a few minutes, such a level of energy consumption is nothing short of impressive.

The role of blockchain in addressing sustainable development challenges extends far beyond the carbon footprint of its applications in financial services. For example, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report recognizes the immense potential of decentralized ledgers to increase efficiency in various areas, including infrastructure, supply chains, and manufacturing.

For instance, blockchain can be used to track and verify the origin of goods, ensuring sustainable and ethical production. Such transparency can incentivize companies to adopt more environmentally friendly practices and help consumers make informed decisions.

Several blockchain startups are revolutionizing the energy industry by monetizing renewable energy generation, reducing prices and energy consumption, creating economic opportunities for households, and encouraging environmentally conscious choices.

For example, using blockchain technology to facilitate peer-to-peer energy exchange allows consumers to sell excess solar energy directly to their neighbors. This innovative approach not only promotes the use of renewable energy sources but also decentralizes the energy market, reducing dependence on large power plants and inefficient energy distribution systems.

Closing Thoughts

Cryptocurrencies and blockchain, in a broader sense, have the potential not only to be part of but also to make a significant contribution to a more sustainable future. By promoting energy-efficient consensus mechanisms, fostering innovation in renewable energy, and promoting transparency and accountability in various industries, these technologies can play an important role in addressing global sustainability challenges and help shape a more environmentally friendly world.

Fact: Blockchains are becoming more energy-efficient and increasingly rely on renewable energy. Additionally, decentralized ledger technology offers solutions to global sustainability issues.

19 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All



bottom of page